U.S. Politics Ignores The Poor

The dignity of the human person. The common good. Solidarity. The option for the poor. These and other principles form the foundations of Catholic social teaching. Our political debate does nothing to speak to these principles.

Think about it. When does the dignity of the working poor ever become an issue in our political discourse and in our larger political culture? And if the poor are mentioned in public debates, are they usually championed or are they labeled "welfare parasites" by a conservative Republican or a centrist Democrat looking to score with independent voters?

When was the last time the common good truly formed the core of a presidential campaign, and a presidential candidate truly spoke to (and gained acceptance from) ordinary and struggling Americans? You'd have to go back to "Give 'em hell, Harry" Truman who deeply and genuinely identified with the blue-collar American worker in 1948 during his whistle-stop campaign tours. That in many ways was the last genuinely honest and largely un-spun presidential campaign in America. As the television age has emerged, presidential campaigns have become a matter of imagery and stagecraft, raised to an art form by both the Clintons and the Karl Rove/George Bush team.

This is not an indictment of Republicans, because Democrats have become just as guilty of excluding the poor and vulnerable from their political vocabularies and from the personal circles and networks politicians choose to establish. Few if any heavyweights in American politics associate with the poor and base both their rhetoric and policies on the well being of the poor. Solidarity, the common good, the welfare of the poor and the dignity of the human person are given zero consideration by our larger political culture and the greatly impoverished discourse that flows from it.

How then do we change this sorry situation to make our political discourse more authentically Catholic and life-affirming? We can effect change by framing issues as interconnected parts of a larger whole, using the seamless garment formulated by the late Cardinal Joseph Bernadin of Chicago.

Let's consider the hot-button issue of abortion...Abortion is currently viewed as a particularly important issue, but ultimately one issue among many. Bishops tell pro-choice Catholic Democrats that good views on other issues don't excuse a pro-choice view on abortion; pro-choice Democrats respond by saying they can't sell a pro-life position within the party, not to mention the larger culture.

There is a solution. Redefine the political debate to not only respect the principles of Catholic social teaching but to lovingly live out those principles toward those who need compassion and support more than anyone else: the vulnerable pregnant women who are agonizing over the toughest decision of their lives. How to do this? It's not rocket science. Abortion should not be considered an isolated issue anymore.

If young women could see an America where living-wage jobs with benefit packages, generous family leave policies and reasonable welfare-to-work time limits : among many other women-friendly policies : all existed, they'd be less inclined to choose abortion.

Yet Republicans and Democrats have tragically failed to link abortion to the many social issues affecting the poor. Republicans, who never put the poor at the heart of their politics, ignore the value of the social issues in the first place. Democrats, so excessively focused on preserving the legality of abortion, have amazingly never considered the political gold mine awaiting them if they linked abortion to the morality of the social issues...

Republicans and Democrats can instantly form a national consensus on abortion that would drasticalkly reduce abortions, all while bringing the principles of Catholic social teaching to life on many other fronts in our society. Similar results could be achieved on other issues as well, but not until we change the focus of our political discourse.

Share:Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestEmail this to someonePrint this page